Please Login:
Username:

Password:

Search TCV:

News & Commentary: by Michelle Malkin
Email a Friend Printer Friendly

No More Ambulances for Terror
August 29, 2006 10:06 PM EST

What kind of cold-blooded thugs use ambulances as killing aids or propaganda tools? Islamic terrorists, of course, have an unsurpassed history of using emergency vehicles as tools of their murderous trade. International charities and media dupes have gone along for the ride.

In March 2002, Israeli Defense Forces discovered a bomb in a Palestine Red Crescent Society ambulance near Jerusalem. The bomb, packed in a suicide belt, was hidden under a gurney carrying a Palestinian child. The driver confessed that it was not the first time ambulances had been used to ferry explosives.

Female suicide bomber Wafa Idris, who blew herself up in a
January 2002 attack in Jerusalem, was a medical secretary for the PRCS. Her
recruiter was an ambulance driver for the same organization, which receives
support from governments worldwide and the American and International Red
Cross.

As I reported in May 2004, an Israeli television station aired
footage of armed Arab terrorists in southern Gaza using an ambulance owned
and operated by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine
Refugees (UNRWA) -- which has received more than $2.5 billion in taxpayer
subsidies. Palestinian gunmen used the UN emergency vehicle as getaway
transportation after murdering six Israeli soldiers. Senior UNRWA employee
Nahed Rashid Ahmed Attalah confessed to using his official UN vehicle to
bypass security and smuggle arms, explosives and terrorists to and from
attacks. Nidal 'Abd al-Fataah 'Abdallah Nizal, a Hamas activist, worked as
an UNRWA ambulance driver and admitted he, too, had used an emergency
vehicle to transport munitions to terrorists.

Peter Hansen, the head of the UNRWA, huffily denied that its
vehicles were being exploited by terrorists. But a few months later, he told
Canada's CBC TV: "I am sure that there are Hamas members on the UNRWA
payroll and I don't see that as a crime."

When they're not being used to ferry weapons, ambulances serve
as major stage props for Hizballah news productions. I remind you again of
CNN anchor Anderson Cooper's description last month of Hizballah's ruse:
"They had six ambulances lined up in a row and said, OK, you know, they
brought reporters there, they said you can talk to the ambulance drivers.
And then one by one, they told the ambulances to turn on their sirens and to
zoom off, and people taking that picture would be reporting, I guess, the
idea that these ambulances were zooming off to treat civilian casualties,
when in fact, these ambulances were literally going back and forth down the
street just for people to take pictures of them."

Keep all this context in mind -- and keep the summer's bombshell
blog revelations of Photoshopped war fauxtography by Reuters and staged
photos by other media outlets in mind--as we move on to the events of July
23. According to the Lebanon Red Cross, two of its ambulances were
deliberately struck by weapons in Qana, Lebanon, while performing rescue
missions. The international press, which has stubbornly ignored the
prolonged exploitation of emergency vehicles by terrorists, immediately
accused Israel of committing "war crimes."

Photos and accounts of the alleged ambulance targeting were
disseminated widely by newswires, the BBC, ITV, The New York Times, the
Boston Globe and countless others. It should be noted that Western
journalists were not allowed onto the scene, but received video and pictures
from locals. Bloggers have again raised pointed doubts about what those
photos really show (see zombietime.com/fraud/ambulance/ and my Internet
video report at hotair.com/archives/2006/08/29/ambulances-for-jihad/). The
roof of one Red Cross ambulance said to have been hit by a missile had a
neat hole punched dead center -- in the same location that ventilation holes
of other ambulances are positioned.

Massive rust and corrosion around the hole suggest the damage
may have occurred before the alleged strike. Moreover, a missile explosion
inside an ambulance would not leave the rest of the vehicle as intact as the
supposedly targeted ambulance remained. A paramedic quoted by several media
organizations claimed a "big fire" engulfed the inside of the vehicle. But
photos of the ambulance allegedly consumed by the fire showed gurneys and
seats intact and minimal damage to the interior.

What is the response from all of the media hypers of the alleged
Red Cross ambulance missile strike last month? The same response they've had
to the jihadists' past ambulance hoaxes: Nothing.

Maybe your political representatives will have more to say. Many
of the UN and Red Cross ambulances and ambulance drivers being exploited by
the likes of Hamas and Hizballah are supported by American taxpayers and
charitable groups. Isn't it time to cut off the ambulances-for-terror
lifeline?

Michelle Malkin is author of the new book "Unhinged: Exposing
Liberals Gone Wild." Her e-mail address is malkin@comcast.net.

COPYRIGHT 2006 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.




DISCLAIMER: TheConservativeVoice.com and TCVdaily.com accept no responsibility for the accuracy
or inaccuracies of any story or opinion. The views expressed on this site are that of
the authors and not necessarily that of TheConservativeVoice.com and TCVdaily.com. We run
banner advertising, Google™ adwords, Kontera™ and stand alone emails in order
to cover the operating costs of delivering the material.