Hypothetical: You go to the bank and sign a contract to borrow money to buy a house. The rules seem simple: if you do not repay the loan as stated in the contract, your house is turned over to the banker. If the debt is paid off as agreed in the contract, the house is yours to keep or sell for a profit.

How would you feel if I came to you and asked for, I am not greedy, thirty percent of money from sale of your property?

If your response was extremely polite you would probably say, "why should I give you part of my money? You were never part of the contract."

Interesting concept--non-signatories to a contract are not entitled to benefit from that contract.

Please explain to me why terrorist organizations who are not signatories or claimed by signatories to Geneva Convention are entitled to benefits of Geneva Convention.

Traditionally people caught on the wrong side of the front lines out of uniform were considered:

1. Spies interested in information;

2. Saboteurs trying to break things;

3. Assassins seeking to neutralize military, political, or other leaders;

4. Terrorists intending to murder innocent civilians.

The above four groups are usually though not always helped or supported by either collaborators or sympathizers.

Please provide me with examples of when any of the above six groups are provided with special or favorable treatment when captured operating on wrong side of front lines. Traditional treatment for captured spies and other five groups has been execution.

Consider cases like Nathan Hale, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, plus other patriotic covert intelligence agents captured while pledging their lives to fight the politics of treason.

Please explain to me when in recent American history, war evolved from winner take all diplomacy to “can’t we all get along during the occupation”. America’s strategy to win wars has evolved from destroying enemy’s will to fight too winning hearts and minds with compassionate conservatism.

If Iran wants Geneva Convention protections for captured terrorists, all Iran has to do is admit terrorists are their puppets and Iran is at war with America.

Mexico’s aristocracy does what is best for Mexico’s aristocracy, like sending their poor, uneducated, criminals, and drugs to America. Why would Mexico engage in such decadent behavior, prevent class based revolution in Mexico. Why should American citizens suffer to benefit Mexico’s aristocracy?

Please explain to me where in America’s constitutional contract with American citizens, constitutional protections and privileges are extended to non-citizens.

Please explain to me where in the Constitution, case law based on feelings or foreign laws replaces the amendment process for changing or altering America’s Constitution.

If terrorists are not entitled to Geneva Convention protections under contract law, and illegals are not entitled to special privileges under Constitutional law; what is their special treatment called, something worse than welfare.

Somebody once said liberals are generous with other people’s money, and conservatives are generous with their own money. What do you call conservatives who are generous with the lives, liberties, and properties of American citizens, counterfeit conservatives.

Back to basics, when you do not know what you are doing, do not know the difference between right and wrong, lack perseverance, do not know when to adapt, do not know who the bad guys are, national security can create a monster that eats you alive. Nothing personal on the part of the monster, losers lose winners win. Winners win.

Again back to the basics, The only rules in covert intelligence are rules of survival. People who ignore national security spend too much time at cemeteries.

American citizens must if they are to survive, learn skills to distinguish among enemy sympathizers, enemy activists, enemy collaborators, and terrorists. Controlling and managing terrorist threats requires managing all components of threat.

The Achilles heel of all terrorists is their black market contacts. A good starting point: support creation of CCI (Covert Counter Intelligence), a quasi-private agency similar to French Foreign Legion.

Recruit the best industry field experienced professionals on planet. What matters these professionals know that oaths are contracts. Hard core drug addicts, alcohol is a drug, and sex offenders lack self discipline and will not be considered.

These operatives in service of America will be given agency resources, criminal and civil immunity plus free reign to manage terrorists threats. After seven years of service, each operative receives a “clean” new identity and one million dollars in cash tax free. Initial start up costs for five thousand of the word’s best intelligence operative starts at about five billion dollars.

Armies manage battlefields private knights the shadows. “Freelance” does not mean services are free. When you get tired of going to funerals because politicians and bureaucrats generally do not deliver promised services, you might give above ideas a second thought.

Closing question: how can United States citizens who are not inclined to reward their own children’s bad behavior, tolerate rewarding criminal behavior by terrorists and illegal immigrants both seeking to destroy American culture?