Those of you who still believe the myth that man made Co2 emissions are driving global warming should do yourself a favor and look at a scientific perspective on the issue. Especially one that includes some of the same scientists the United Nations IPPC has falsely credited with support of the myth. 

The world of science does not appeal to emotion with sisters dying of cancer, frogs cooking in boiling water, scales of gold and the earth as alternate false choices, or lies about mosquitoes moving north and spreading disease. Scientists rely on facts to either substantiate or disprove their facts and deplore the world of emotion. There is no issue of who won the presidential race or which of the two crooks who ran for president are the worst; it is an issue of what is factual information not belief.

How can public debate over such a crucial issue be reduced to debate between a buffoon (take your pick) and somebody who runs like girl (take your pick). Theatrics and propaganda are these peoples way of living.

Intelligent people who use reason and logic do not need to be persuaded by hyperbole and flowing rivers on the old farm somebody’s daddy owned. That melancholy should be reserved for the terminally stupid in any scientific debate. For those intellectual individuals who relish logic in arguments this kind of an emotional appeal is an insult to their basic intelligence and ability to think on their own.

• William Mather Lewis "Today the world is the victim of propaganda because people are not intellectually competent. More than anything the United States needs effective citizens competent to do their own thinking."

All who remain uninformed and fooled must look at the critical scientific BBC Documentary. If you do not you have no right to be critical of it. It is developed by the same scientists the UN IPPC uses to support Al Gore erroneous conclusions.

• Sir Francis Bacon: "Nothing doth more hurt in a state than that cunning men pass for wise."

Poor and developing countries are suffering as a result of this egregious false global warming myth, it is not science. Third world countries can not benefit from development because of restrictions on man made CO2 emissions.

The documentary is somewhat technical but it can be easily understood if one has an elementary science background and tries. It is a shame so many people are being made fools of by the global warming gang. You must at least watch the BBC Documentary and then draw your conclusions.

We should have developed as a society much further than we have but on many issues our ignorance is treated as a badge of honor. It is no wonder someone like Gore can pull this off; America is failing in educating people how to read and write, they sure can’t think in scientific terms.

• Miguel Deunamuno Y Jugo Ignorance: “The skeptic does not mean him who doubts, but him who investigates or researches, as opposed to him who asserts and thinks he has found.”

The text of the documentary on BBC was the same as it was when it first reported on the reported “phenomenon” some 20 years ago. The problem with the Gore oversimplification of hard scientific facts is he minimizes impact of long range changes in weather related to the sun and dismisses other influences as too complicated for you to understand. Just because he may choose to not understand doesn’t mean we are not capable of understanding. Man made co2 impact is so minimal in the natural environment as to be inconsequential. It constitutes only two parts of 25 in the natural atmosphere.

The issue is not whether the earth goes through cycles of warming and cooling but what the primary cause is and what can be done if anything to change it. Relentless pseudo scientific reports kept defining outrageous impact of CO2 gasses world wide. I have files of articles and photos on the ice melts, warmer temperatures and weather changers in the current century.

However, there is no definitive relationship in any of those articles between the CO2 man made emissions and increased temperature. It is the same as the report that people who drink cheap beer have more STD. The beer doesn’t cause it, it is just a corollary unconnected incident that has no impact.

Comparing cancer causes such as smoking and trying to relate unproven science of global warming to CO2 manmade emissions is nonsensical and unethical. Surface information provided by Al Gore in the Inconvenient Truth Documentary was very crude and did not take into consideration scientific fact or debate.

Gore kept referring to the large number of world scientists who support his myth. He did not say how much their personal fortunes depended on federal funding related to coming to conclusion about global warming that met the conclusions wanted. He did not name them or offer conflicting information as would have been appropriate in a scientific instead of political debate.

The BBC documentary is the first fully scientific report by scientists instead of politicians. These people are the book worm technical people who would rather die than be wrong or report a decimal out of place even when it is carried out to 20 places. They are boring, factual and convincing in their positions with overwhelming documentation. Their argument is so convincing it is easily understood and accepted by those who are not scientists. It would do you good to at least devote time to viewing the BBC Documentary, because the same scientists quoted by the IPPC and Al Gore are in it debunking the IPPC report and Al Gore in its entirety.

• Buddha - Hindu Prince Gautama Siddharta: "Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true."

After multiple reviews of the BBC Documentary and review of the scientists’ credentials involved, The Al Gore film in retrospect looks like a child’s movie full of emotion, distortion, outrage for being cheated out of the presidency, and short of factual data that supports his hypothesis.

His arguments are equivalent of arguing the world is flat. The levels of CO2 follow the changes in temperature but by about 800 years. There is no direct causal relationship between the warming or cooling and levels of CO2 man made emissions.

It may do you good to look at the documentary with an open mind. That is something many people fail to do when exposed to political rhetoric. I have been guilty and feel damn dumb for it when I fail to look at all sides with equal skepticism. Don’t be made a fool of.

Scientific issues should not be controlled by politics of malcontent loser or winner politicians; it should be controlled only by unfettered truth and freedom to explore what truth is without political interference from either side.

I have given my membership in the flat world society up. Join me. Watch the documentary. Contact the scientists in the documentary or those who have contacted me. You will be enlightened.

You may be able to do something positive for the starving people in the developing part of the world that are being held back and impoverished by both environmentalists and global corporations.

The Truth Shall Set YOU FREE.

Other contacts for those who are so inclined to know the truth:

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Complete) BBC Documentary

There is additional correspondence from the UK long range forecasting unit at John Jones < weathertiger@yahoo.co.uk > or Piers Corbyn, Astrophysist, Director of Weather Action, Long Range Weather Forcasters. Weather Action The Long Range Forecasters -

Delta House, 175-177 Borough High Street , London SE1 1HR

Tel +44(0)20 7939 9946 Fax +44(0)20 7939 9901 E: info@weatheraction.com

CONTACT Piers Corbyn +44(0)7958713320.