"For the first time, Democratic loyalists not necessarily committed to Clinton are wondering whether the party's system for picking a nominee is the problem."

--Bob Novak

Hmmmm...you really think so?

Seriously, there is more than one problem:

1) The Democratic Party has been hijacked by the extreme left wing. Thus the person who wins the nomination by most delegates OR by popular vote may be ill-positioned to win the general election. This has happened before with McGovern and others, has it not?

This hijacking has been accomplished by a vast left wing Media-Political Complex consisting of the mainstream media, organizations funded by radicals such as George Soros, ever-increasingly left-wing Democratic politicians, and far-left bloggers with no compunction against unleashing their venom on others in the Democratic Party.

2) The superdelegates' role was expressly created to negate the votes of the extreme elements of the party and allow the nomination of a viable candidate.

3) Unfortunately, the superdelegates are basically cowards now, like senators, and pander to their own constituencies and don't have the courage to vote for the best candidate--who may not even still be in the running anyway!

4) The Democratic Party has for a long time existed as a conglomeration of mostly one-issue groups held together for the most part by the pro-abortion and class warfare high-tax glues. This year the black voters have a semi-viable black to vote for, which tends to weaken the glue holding them to the party as a whole.

5) The Bush Derangement Syndrome has played a part by boosting the chances of the most vocally anti-Bush, other than the hopeless Dennis Kucinich. The only thing he has going for him is his wife.

The result is that the proportional delegate apportionment, the major flaw in the Democratic nominatino process, has prevented the emergence of a clear winner and thus the decision will fall upon cowardly superdelegates who may vote for Obama, who appears to have no significant chance of winning in November, given the revelations about his association with radical terrorists, his clearly Marxist political leanings, his ultra-liberal voting record, his 20-yr membership in a blatantly anti-American and anti-white and objectively anti-black church (teaching as it does the "black value system," one of whose tenets is "don't strive to get into the middle class"), and given his wife's blatantly anti-American attitude and thinly veiled hostility toward American society.

If you analyze it--surprise!--the problem with the Democratic nominatin process is that it has become too democratic! It has become the will of the mob. And this is what they want to impose on the whole country. Remember the talk of doing away with the Electoral College?  Remember the cries that Bush should pull out of Iraq because the majority of Americans want us to pull out?   The Democratic Party nomination process is a great example of why our Founding Fathers created a republic, not a democracy.