Washington, DC Traditional Values Coalition Executive Director Andrea Lafferty complained today that an article in the Washington Post about the clothes worn by Supreme Court nominee John Roberts children was unfair and disappointing.
Mrs. Lafferty said in a letter sent to Post Editor Leonard Downie, Jr. that the Post has now set a new pecking order for unfair journalism which ignores substance and slides right into chortling about form.
If you cant come up with something disgusting about the actual nominee or his wife then rough-up the kids some and see what happens, Mrs. Lafferty said today.
Post fashion writer Robin Givhan complained about the nostalgic costuming of the children at the Presidents announcement
Just when it looked like there was an opportunity for a substantive debate over Mr. Roberts qualification for the Supreme Court, the Post drags it down to your mother dresses you funny school yard banter.
Maybe the cynics over at the Post are not impressed with the President or the White House but a family about to see their father nominated by the President of the United States for Americas highest court will probably want to dress-up for the occasion. Most Americans would understand what the Post views as some sort of cynical ploy and deception.
There are clothes you wear to the playground and clothes you wear to meet the President, Mrs. Roberts and her adorable children understand that which has apparently eluded the Post.
Lets raise the bar on this debate back to where it is the nominee who is given a vigorous public examination. And lets leave the rest of the family alone.


